Loading document...
Application No.: 25/90684/B Applicant: Mr & Mrs Adam Killip Proposal: Replacement of existing integral conservatory with integral garden room Site Address: 21 St Stephens Meadow Sulby Isle Of Man IM7 3DA Principal Planner: Chris Balmer Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 25.02.2026 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason.
Overall, the extension would have no significant impacts to residential amenities nor public amenities to warrant a refusal. It is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Isle Of Man Strategic Plan 2016 and the Residential Design Guide 2021.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawing all received on 28.01.2026.
_________________________________________________________________ Right to Appeal It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal: Local Authority - No Objection
1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE - 1.1 The application site is the residential curtilage of 21 St Stephens Meadow, Sulby, a two storey detached dwelling located on the eastern side of St Stephens Meadow and to the northeast of Sulby Primary School. The dwelling sits within a housing estate of similar style/types of properties. To the south/southwest (side) boundary of the site is a small wooded area and beyond the A3.
2.0 PLANNING POLICIES - 2.1 The application site is located within an area identified as being "Residential" on the Sulby Local Plan and the site is not within a Conservation Area. The site is not within a flood risks area. As such, the following parts of the Strategic Plan are relevant: - 2.2 General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan is considered applicable, which states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
3.1 There are no previous planning applications associated with the site which are considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application. - 4.0 PROPOSAL
4.1 Planning approval is sought for the replacement of existing integral conservatory with integral garden room. The rear extension would have a depth of 5.7metres, a width of 5.1metres and a maximum ridge height of 3.6metres. The external finishes are proposed to match the existing dwelling.
5.1 Lezayre Commissioners do not object (06.02.2026).
6.1 The key issues relate to the potential visual impact upon the street scene and potential impact upon neighbouring amenities. Potential visual impact upon the street scene
6.2 The proposed extension in terms of its design, proportion, position and finishes are in keeping with the existing property and would be an acceptable form of development.
6.3 Within the street scene, being to the rear the works would not be especially publicly apparent given the boundary features of the site and mature wooded area to the east, south and southeast of the site. However, notwithstanding this give there are no concerns with the design approach or the scale of the development. Accordingly, from these respects the proposals would comply with General Policy 2 and the Residential Design Guide 2021. Potential impact upon neighbouring amenities - 6.4 The property most likely to be affected by the works is Nr 20 to the north of the site. However, given the design, scale, height, boundary treatment and distances to this property, it is not considered the potential impacts would be so significant to warrant a refusal.
7.1 Overall, the extension would have no significant impacts to residential amenities nor public amenities to warrant a refusal. It is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Isle Of Man Strategic Plan 2016 and the Residential Design Guide 2021 and therefore it is recommended that the application be approved. - 8.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted). - 8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:
that submit a relevant objection; and o any other person who has made an objection that meets specified criteria.
8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
8.5 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given the Right to Appeal.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted Date: 25.02.2026 Determining Officer Signed : J SINGLETON Jason Singleton Principal Planner
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown