Loading document...
Application No.: 25/90994/B Applicant: Mr & Mrs Patrick Carolan Proposal: Erection of single storey extension to east elevation of existing dwellinghouse Site Address: 30 Ballacriy Park Colby Isle Of Man IM9 4LU Senior Planning Officer: Mrs Louise Phillips Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 13.01.2026 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
By virtue of its modest scale, siting and complementary design, the proposed extension could be comfortably accommodated upon the site without detriment to the character and appearance of the host property or wider area. It would cause no harm to the living conditions enjoyed by neighbouring occupiers. Consequently, the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Development Plan.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the following drawings:
Right to Appeal It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal: o Arbory and Rushen District Commissioners: No objection.
_________________________________________________________________ Officer’s Report
1.0 THE SITE - 1.1 The application relates to a detached bungalow on a corner plot in Ballacriy Road. Both the north and south elevations have gable ends, but the property also has several small flat roofed additions. There is a hedge/planting along the eastern boundary with the road, beyond which lies a narrow access lane and then a field. The property is bordered to the north and west by other similar bungalows.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL - 2.1 The proposed development is a single storey extension to the east elevation facing the road to extend the kitchen and provide an additional bedroom with en-suite bathroom. It would replace an attached, flat-roofed store. The extension would have a gable end of the same height and proportions of those on the north and south elevations, which would be finished in white painted render. The roof tiles, windows and doors would match those on the existing dwelling and three rooflights, one very small, would be provided on the south roof slope.
3.1 The site is not within a Conservation Area and there are no Registered Buildings, Registered Trees or Registered Tree Areas in the vicinity. The site is not at risk of flooding. Area Plan for the South - 3.2 The site is within a predominantly residential area. Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 - 3.3 Strategic Policy 3 requires development to have regard to local character. - 3.4 General Policy 2 - Provides various criteria for development management purposes, including those below which are relevant to this proposal. The development should:
5.1 20/01005/B: erection of an extension and relocation of front porch doorway. Permitted.
5.2 88/01345/B: Erection of kitchen extension. Permitted. - 6.0 REPRESENTATIONS
6.1 Arbory and Rushen Parish District Commissioners (23/12/25): The Commissioners support the application. - 6.2 The following organisations were consulted on 11/11/25 but, at the time this report was drafted, no comments had been received:
7.0 ASSESSMENT - 7.1 The main issues are the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property and wider area; and upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.
Character and Appearance
7.2 Ballacriy Park comprises similar bungalows with some features individual to each property. The plots are of slighty different shapes and sizes so that some are closer to the road than others. The front elevation of the application property is set back from the road and the hedge along the boundary provides significant screening of the east elevation.
7.3 The proposed extension to the east side would increase the width of the building by approximately 2m and, in this sense, it would be a modest addition. The gable roof and matching materials would ensure its appearance was compatible with that of the host dwelling. The new expanse of roof would make the building more prominent in the street scene when viewed from the south, but it would be set back, well away from the road, and would not be overbearing. Similarly, while the extension would be quite close to the eastern boundary of the site, other buildings in the area are close to the road and the planting screen would soften its appearance. - 7.4 Overall, by virtue of its modest scale, siting and complementary design, the proposed extension could be comfortably accommodated upon the site without detriment to the character and appearance of the host property or wider area. Thus it would comply with Strategic Policy 3 of the Strategic Plan and with General Policy 2(b), (c) and (g). Living Conditions - 7.5 The roof of the proposed extension would increase the height of the built form facing the neighbouring property to the north, but it would be no closer than the existing flat roofed store to be replaced. Given the relative orientation of the buildings, there would be no loss of light in the garden and the existing boundary fence would prevent mutual overlooking to and from the new ground floor windows. Therefore, the proposed development would not be significantly detrimental to the living conditions enjoyed at the neighbouring property to the north; and neighbouring occupiers to the west would not see the extension from inside their house. The proposal would comply with General Policy 2(g) of the Strategic Plan. Other Issues - 7.6 The proposed development would not have any implications for parking or highway safety; and no other concerns have been raised.
8.1 For the reasons given above, the proposed development would cause no significant harm in respect of either character and appearance or neighbouring living conditions and it would therefore comply with the relevant policies of the Development Plan. It is recommended for approval accordingly. - 9.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
9.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).
9.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:
9.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 9.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status, and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 26.01.2026 Determining Officer
Signed : S BUTLER Stephen Butler Head of Development Management
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown