20 February 2006 · Delegated - Director of Planning and Building Control (M. I. McCauley)
65, Lezayre Park, Ramsey, Isle Of Man, IM8 2pt
The proposal involves enlarging an approved dormer window on the rear roof slope of a semi-detached house in the established residential area of Lezayre Park, Ramsey. This is an amendment to prior approvals under PA 02/01741/B and related applications.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer deferred the decision pending the outcome of an appeal on the related prior application PA 05/00645/B, which was dismissed by the Minister, upholding approval based on the Planning Inspect…
Time limit
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
Approved drawings
This approval relates to drawing no.s 5099/1 rev. D and 5099/2 date stamped the 7th November 2005.
no objection to the proposal
Ramsey Town Commissioners had no objection to the dormer window enlargement amendment. A neighbouring resident, Mrs SA Kinrade, objected due to privacy invasion concerns.
Ramsey Town Commissioners
No ObjectionI am directed to advise that the Ramsey Town Commissioners considered the above application at their meeting on Wednesday 16th November, 2005, and have no objection to the proposal.
The original application (05/00645/B) sought amendments to approved permission 02/01741/B for a car port and extension at 65 Lezayre Park, including enclosing it into a garage with a kitchen window and new front entrance; the Planning Committee granted permission. Neighbour Mrs S A Kinrade appealed, arguing loss of privacy to her front door, driveway and garden from the kitchen window, plus adverse visual impact from the enclosed garage. The Committee and Ramsey Town Commissioners defended that the angled orientation and public footpath limited overlooking acceptably. The inspector found no unacceptable increase in overlooking, as the affected areas were already publicly visible via the pedestrian link, and the visual change from infilling arches was not harmful. The Minister accepted the inspector's recommendation to dismiss the appeal on 8 December 2005.
Precedent Value
Appeals against neighbour approvals on privacy grounds are unlikely to succeed where overlooking affects only publicly visible areas like front gardens and drives separated by footpaths. Future appellants should demonstrate harm beyond existing public views.
Inspector: Andrew D Kirby