20 December 2005 · Planning Committee constituted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 of the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982
Ard Na Mara House, Quines Hill, Port Soderick, Isle Of Man, IM4 1ba
The proposal involved side and rear extensions to the existing detached dwelling at Southampton Farm, Quines Hill, Port Soderick, including alterations to elevations with dormer windows and creation of an attached but non-internally linked granny flat unit.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer noted the proposal comprises side and rear extensions with alterations including dormer windows and an attached non-internally linked granny flat.
Time limit
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
Approved drawings
This approval relates to drawing no.s 05/509/1, 05/509/2 and 05/50/5 date stamped the 2nd September 2005.
Roof materials
The roof(s) must finished in dark natural slate.
Ancillary accommodation only
The attached, but non-internally linked, unit of accommodation created by this approval to the side of the original dwelling must only be used as accommodation ancillary to that of the existing attached dwelling. For the avoidance of doubt, no approval should hereby be conferred by this approval for the use of the new accommodation as a separate dwelling.
recognise that the proposal entails a significant amount of restoration but on balance have no objections
no objection to the proposed works; building set back from road and screened by trees minimising impact; consistent with other local approvals not following Manx vernacular per Circular 3/91
Multiple consultees responded to application 05/02024/B for alterations and extensions to Southampton Farm, with Braddan Parish Commissioners and DOT Highways objecting on design and highway access grounds, while SPMC&E raised no objection and Andrew Jessopp supported the proposal.
Key concern: no details given of any access, including sightlines, for a proposed road or drive onto the adopted highway
SPMCE
No ObjectionThe Society therefore raises no objection.
Braddan Parish Commissioners
ObjectionThe Commissioners would recommend that there is no material planning reason to object to the principle of the application, but that there are material reasons to object to the detail of the application; The above objection was without prejudice to a further revised design being submitted
DOT Highways
ObjectionThere are no details given of any access, including sightlines, for a proposed road or drive onto the adopted highway, to serve the needs of the development.; In the interests of road safety.
Andrew Jessopp
SupportI have no objection to the proposed works.; The building is set back from the road, and generally screened by trees, so the impact of the proposed changes, when viewed from the road, will not be, in my opinion, such as to warrant refusal.; Considering other approvals in the vicinity for alterations and extensions, which haven't followed the form of 'Manx vernacular', then I see no reason why the design should adhere slavishly to circular 3/91 in this case.
