17 October 2005 · Planning Committee
Seamount, Marina Lane, Port Erin, Isle Of Man, IM9 6lb
The site is Seamount Cottage, a semi-detached house on Marina Lane in Port Erin, in a residential area. The proposal involved demolishing the existing two-storey rear annex (2.6m wide, 2.8m projection, 5.5m ridge height) and rebuilding it larger at 3.1m wide, 2.9m long, and 6.2m high, plus replacing front and rear wind…
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The property is an existing semi-detached house in a residential area on the Port Erin Plan. The replacement annex is taller (6.2m vs 5.5m) and wider (3.1m vs 2.6m) but the officer noted it projects o…
Time limit
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
Approved drawings
This permission relates to the rebuilding of the rear extension as shown in drawings 101 - 105 inclusive all received on 30th August, 2005.
Materials matching
The external finishes of the extension must match those of the existing building in all respects.
no views, no adverse traffic impacts
Approved
Highways Division raised no objections due to no adverse traffic impacts; Port Erin Commissioners approved the application; Arragon Properties objected due to loss of light and overbearing impact.
Key concern: proposed new rear extension will block light and be overbearing to adjoining property
Highways Division
No ObjectionThe Highways Division of the Department of Transport has no views on the following applications, the applications having been considered and having no adverse traffic impacts.
Port Erin Commissioners
SupportThe above application was considered by my Commissioners at their Meeting held on the 20th September, 2005. I am directed to inform you the application has been Approved.
Arragon Properties Ltd
ObjectionWe object to the above application as owners of 2 Victoria Square, Port Erin a property which directly adjoins the subject property to the rear.; We are concerned that the proposed new rear extension, which is vastly increased in height from what is existing, will block light from our own property and be over bearing to the tenants of the three flats.
