3 April 2012 · Minister for Infrastructure
Workshop, Elm Tree Road, Onchan, Isle Of Man, IM3 4ef
The proposal sought to vary condition 3 of the 1987 approval (87/01441/C) which restricted the workshop's use to works associated with the adjacent car showroom, allowing independent operation as a car valet serving up-market vehicles with 2 employees and up to 10-15 cars per day.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
Initial refusal by Development Control Manager cited restricted building/forecourt size causing disturbance, inconvenience and highway harm, plus insufficient parking contrary to GP2(h), as proposal w…
General Policy 2
GP2 permits development in zoning if respecting site/surroundings, providing safe access/parking/manoeuvring, no unacceptable highway effect, no adverse amenity impact. Officer found failure on parking (h), highway safety (h), amenity (g). Appeal found compliant subject to conditions addressing these via hours, forecourt use, drainage.
Time limit
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
Approved plans
This permission relates to the use of the premises as shown in drawings in the location and block plans ONC/SKILL/1, ONC/SKILL/2 and ONC/SKILL/3 date stamped 21 November 2011.
Operating hours
The use hereby permitted shall not be open to customers except between the hours of 09.00 and 18.00 on Mondays to Fridays and 09.00 and 18.00 on Saturdays and not at anytime on Sundays, Bank or Public Holidays.
No external work
No work(s) shall be undertaken outside of the building.
Forecourt use
The forecourt area of the building, immediately adjacent to Elm Tree Road, shall be used for the parking of vehicles solely in conjunction with the car valeting business and not for any other purpose or use.
Drainage provision
No washing of vehicles shall be undertaken at the premises unless drainage provision has been provided and thereafter retained in accordance with details submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.
no objection subject to a condition
Recommend approval subject to condition restricting vehicles on site to 4 at any one time
Highways Division initially deferred then recommended conditional approval with vehicle limits; Water and Sewerage Authority had no objection subject to pollution prevention; Onchan District Commissioners objected due to parking, traffic, and wastewater concerns; multiple residents objected over parking and noise.
Key concern: exacerbation of traffic flows and parking problems in congested residential area
Highways Division
Conditional No ObjectionRecommend approval subject to the imposition of the following condition; No more than 4 vehicles should be on site at any one time.; only 10 vehicles could be valeted within the proposed opening hours.
Conditions requested: No more than 4 vehicles should be on site at any one time; only 10 vehicles could be valeted within the proposed opening hours
Highways Division
No CommentDefer; Additional information required on the number of vehicles per hour/day expected to be valeted.
Isle of Man Water and Sewerage Authority
Conditional No ObjectionNo Objection: - subject to the following conditions; it is an offence under Manx legislation to permit the discharge of polluting or harmful matter to any public sewers or watercourses.
Conditions requested: Appropriate measures must be taken by the developer / occupier of the premises to ensure compliance with the legislation [regarding discharge of polluting or harmful matter to any public sewers or watercourses]
Onchan District Commissioners
ObjectionThe Commissioners recommend that the application be REFUSED; the application be dismissed and the application REFUSED
The original application sought to vary condition 3 of the 1987 permission, which tied workshop use to an adjacent car showroom in separate ownership, to enable independent car valet use; refused due to potential highway disturbance and insufficient parking contrary to GP2(h). Appellant argued historical independent use, unreasonable condition due to separate ownerships, and low-impact auto detailing with available parking. Council and Onchan Commissioners defended refusal citing increased vehicle throughput, parking pressure, highway safety, and drainage concerns. Inspector found condition 3 unreasonable and unenforceable as it negated permission benefits and did not effectively control activity levels; appeal allowed subject to new conditions on hours, external work, forecourt use, and conditional drainage.
Precedent Value
Appeals can succeed by challenging flawed historic conditions as unreasonable if they negate permission or rely on third-party compliance; new tailored conditions often key to overcoming amenity/highway objections in constrained urban sites.
Inspector: Alan Langton
