Officer Report

Application No.: 25/91022/B Applicant: Mrs Jenny Forbes Proposal: Conversion of existing barns/stables to ancillary accommodation with erection of single storey extension and alterations to doors and fenestration Site Address: Upper Garth Farm Upper Garth Garth Road Crosby IM4 2HB Planning Officer: Paul Visigah Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 27.01.2026 _________________________________________________________________

Conditions and Notes for Approval

C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions

• C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.

Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.

• C 2. The accommodation hereby approved may only be used in association with the main dwelling house at 'Upper Garth Farm', Upper Garth, Garth Road, Crosby, and for purposes incidental to the use of main dwelling house as a single dwelling, for no commercial purposes and only in accordance with the internal layout as shown on the submitted Drawing No. 25/08/05 received 20 November 2025, and being retained thereafter.

Reason: The application has been assessed only in terms of this restricted use; as proposed, and any other use may have an adverse effect/additional consideration on the character and amenity of the area and highway safety, contrary to General Policy 2(h & i) and Transport Policy 4 of the Strategic Plan 2016.

• C 3. Notwithstanding the details provided within this application, no permission is given to the use of the barn as tourist accommodation or as separate residential accommodation not ancillary to the main dwelling.

• Reason: The application has been assessed on the basis of ancillary accommodation only, as proposed.
• C 4. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, a schedule including specifications and manufacturers details of all external materials (including roofing, windows, doors, and rainwater goods) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Department. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and retained as such thereafter.

Reason: To ensure a high standard of design and to preserve the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area (GP2, SP4).

• C 5. Prior to the occupation of the ancillary accommodation hereby approved, the two swallow nest boxes shown on Drawing No. 25/08/05, submitted on 20 November 2025, shall be installed in the positions indicated on that drawing. The nest boxes shall be retained as such thereafter. Reason: To safeguard and enhance biodiversity in accordance with Environment Policies 4 and

• 5.

• C 6. No new external lighting shall be installed on the development hereby approved other than lighting designed, positioned and operated in accordance with the recommendations of the Bat Conservation Trust and Institution of Lighting Professionals Guidance Note 8: Bats and Artificial Lighting (2018).

Reason: To safeguard species and habitats in the area in accordance with General Policy 2(d), and Environment Policies 4 and 5.

This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason.

On balance, the proposed development is acceptable in principle in this countryside location, without detriment to the character or amenities of the wider landscape or the amenities of surrounding residential properties. The scheme would also ensure the continued use of existing buildings of architectural, historic, or social interest, and preserve the island's built fabric. There would be no adverse highway safety impacts resulting from the development and ecological impacts would be acceptable. The application is, therefore, considered to comply with General Policy 3, Environment Policies 1, 4 and 5, Housing Policy 11, and General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan.

Plans/Drawings/Information; This decision relates to the following plans and documents, received on 20 November 2025:

• o COVERING LETTER
• o BAT SURVEY
• o STRUCTURAL ENGINEER REPORT
• o Dwg. 01 LOCATION PLAN AND SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
• o Dwg. 02 EXISTING SITE PLAN
• o Dwg. 03 EXISTING PLANS ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS
• o Dwg. 04 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
• o Dwg. 05 PROPOSED PLANS ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS

Right to Appeal It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal:

• o DOI Highway Services - No objection, subject to condition which has been applied.
• o Marown Parish Commissioners - No objection _________________________________________________________________

Officer’s Report

1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE - 1.1 The application site is irregularly shaped parcel of land that includes a large, detached dwelling of fairly recent construction along with associated agricultural and equestrian-related buildings, known as Upper Garth Farm, situated on the northern side of Garth Road, Crosby. The site is part of a larger holding with fields enclosing the farmyard on all sides. These fields are marked with a blue-line boundary indicating that they are within the applicant's ownership/control. - 1.2 The application buildings are Manx stone buildings of traditional form which are joined on the northern edge. The roof of both buildings is covered in slate tiles, with existing fenestrations on the buildings are also reflective of their historic use. The door opening at the rear of the stables has been closed up in block work. - 1.3 The buildings, including the subjects buildings are largely concealed from the highway due to the topography of the site in relation to the highway, the raised sodbanks long the highway which rises to about 2 to 3m along sections, and the existing mature trees that run along the eastern edge of the farmyard, with views only achievable where there is a break to allow for access to the riding arena which is situated further east of the building group on site.

2.0 THE PROPOSAL - 2.1 Planning approval is sought for conversion of existing barns/stables to ancillary accommodation with erection of single storey extension and alterations to doors and fenestration. - 2.2 The existing barn and stable buildings which are joined on the northern edge, almost forming an L-shape would be converted to a new ancillary dwelling on site. This new dwelling will provide for a plant room, snug, and ensuite attached to a bedroom, utility; utility, WC, kitchen/dining area, lounge, a card room, and another bedroom with ensuite on the ground floor, while the first floor, which is only above the southern building, will provide for a kitchen/living area, hall, shower, and bedroom. - 2.3 To enable the creation of the lounge, a new single storey pitched roofed extension would be erected on the western elevation of the northern stable and will close up the northern elevation of the southern stable. This extension would be finished externally in Cedral cladding boards in wood slate grey, creating a contrast with the predominantly stone finish of the buildings, while the roof would be finished in natural slate.

2.3 The building would retain its Manx stone finish externally (save for the extension), while most of the fenestrations would be retained, with minor alterations to the southwest elevation to replace a door and window with a set of bifolding doors; replacing an existing door and window with a bifold door, as well as two windows with a bifold door on the southeast elevation; and opening up the closed door on the northeast elevation to create a window opening. All replacement and proposed windows and external replacement and new doors are to be black UPVC units. 12 rooflights are to be installed over the roof of the converted dwelling. - 2.4 There would be no changes to the access and parking arrangement, while the 8 parking spaces serving the site would be retained. There would be some level changes to allow for the reception of the extension. Surface run foo would be managed by a new soakaway, while foul sewage would be managed via existing septic tank. No trees are to be impacted by the development. - 2.5 The application is supported by a Structural Appraisal prepared by Structura Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers and dated October 2025 which makes the following conclusion/recommendation:

"3.0 Conclusions

• o The front external walls to the single storey barns two and three have deflected
• outward by approximately 50 and 25mm respectively, which has been caused by the thrust from the A frame truss. The associated cracking to the stonework has occurred as the wall has moved outwards from the party wall and gable walls.
• o This is quite common with this type of roof structure arrangement with Manx stone barns.
• o In their current condition the walls are stable, however if the walls are left in their current state, they will continue to deteriorate with further movement occurring.
• o The party and gable walls have experienced some nominal movement however they are stable in their current condition.
• o There external Manx stonewalls do not appear to have experienced any significant foundation movement.

4.0 Recommendations

• o The barns are in a reasonable condition considering their age and are structurally stable and would be suitable for conversion to ancillary accommodation.
• o As part of the proposed works to be undertaken the existing A frame trusses will be stiffened and the external walls will be further tied to the internal walls by way of concrete stitch beams which will enhance the overall stability of the barns.
• o All new building works are to be undertaken by a suitably experienced main contractor working in accordance with the structural engineers' details."

2.6 The application is also supported by a Preliminary Assessment for Bats prepared by Manx Bat Group and dated 16 June 2025.

3.0 PLANNING POLICIES - 3.1 Site Specific:

• 3.1.1 The site lies within an area designated on the Area Plan for the East as land not zoned for a particular purpose. While the site is not within a Conservation Area, part of the site is prone to flood risks, although the site of the proposed development is without the flood prone areas. There are no registered trees on the site, and the site is not within a registered tree area.

3.2 Area: TAPE (2020)

• 3.2.1 The Character Appraisal within the Area Plan for the East states thus concerning the area - Union Mills, Glen Vine & Crosby (C3):

• 3.2.2 Landscape Strategy: "Conserve and enhance: a) the character, quality and distinctiveness of the well-treed valley with some scattered and nucleated settlements. Key Views Open views up to the Northern Uplands and the upper slopes of Foxdale in places. Glimpsed views in the East towards the urban edge of Douglas"

3.3 National: STRATEGIC PLAN (2016)

• 3.3.1 In terms of strategic plan policy, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 contains the following policies that are considered specifically material to the assessment of the planning application:

• 1. General Policy 3 - Exceptions to development in the countryside.
• 2. General Policy 2 - General Development Considerations.
• 3. Environment Policy 1 - Protection of the countryside and inherent ecology.
• 4. Environment Policy 2 - Protection of Areas of High Landscape or Coastal Value and

Scenic Significance.

• 5. Housing Policy 4 - New housing will be located primarily within our existing towns and

villages, or, where appropriate, in sustainable urban extensions of these towns and villages. Refers to exceptional circumstances where new housing will be permitted in the countryside.

• 6. Housing Policy 11 - Guides the conversion of existing rural buildings into dwellings.
• 7. Strategic Policy 1 - Efficient use of land and resources.

• 8. Strategic Policy 2 - Priority for new development to identified towns and villages.
• 9. Strategic Policy 4 - development proposals must protect or enhance the nature

conservation and landscape quality of urban as well as rural areas.

• 10. Strategic Policy 5 - Design and visual impact.
• 11. Spatial Policy 5 - new development will be in defined settlements only or in the

countryside only in accordance with GP3.

• 12. Transport Policy 1 - Proximity to existing public transport facilities and routes, including

pedestrian, cycle and rail routes important for new development.

• 13. Transport Policy 4 - Highway safety.
• 14. Transport Policy 7 - Parking considerations/standards for development.
• 15. Community Policies 7, 10 and 11 provide guidance in respect of minimising criminal

activity and reducing spread of fire, while Infrastructure Policy 5 deals with methods for water conservation.

• 16. Environment Policy 4 - Protects biodiversity (including protected species and designated

sites).

• 17. Environment Policy 5 - Mitigation against damage to or loss of habitats.
• 18. Section 8.10 Conversion of Rural Buildings to Dwellings:

• a. "8.10.1 Throughout the countryside, there are examples of buildings which are no

longer suitable or needed for their originally intended use, but which are of sufficient quality or interest to warrant retention and re-use.

• b. 8.10.2 Conversion of such buildings into dwellings can make a useful contribution to the

housing stock, ensure retention of our built heritage, and improve the appearance of what might otherwise become derelict fabric."

- 4.0 OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS

4.1 Residential Design Guide (2021)

• 4.1.1 This document provides advice on the design of new houses and extensions to existing property as well as how to assess the impact of such development on the living conditions of those in adjacent residential properties and sustainable methods of construction.

4.2 The Isle of Man's Biodiversity Strategy (2015 - 2025)

• 4.2.1 The Department's Biodiversity Strategy is capable of being a material consideration. It seeks to manage biodiversity changes to minimise loss of species and habitats, whilst seeking to maintain, restore and enhance native biodiversity, where necessary.

- 5.0 PLANNING HISTORY

5.1 The site has been the subject of the following planning applications which are considered relevant in the assessment and determination of the current application.

• 1. PA 06/02135/B to Demolish existing and erection of a replacement farmhouse with

integral garage - Approved.

• 2. PA 16/00133/B for Alteration and conversion of part of outbuilding to a dwelling,

extension to outbuilding to create tack/storeroom and installation of replacement windows Approved. The first-floor section of the two-storey outbuilding, which is part of the current proposal building was converted to a dwelling within this scheme. Condition 2 revoked the PD under Class 38.

• 3. PA 17/00239/C for Additional use of approved conversion of outbuilding to a dwelling to

provide tourist accommodation - Approved. This allowed the use of the converted first floor dwelling as tourist accommodation.

• 4. PA 24/00220/B for Erection of extension to front elevation to replace veranda, erection

of an extension to side elevation, replace existing garage door with two windows, aperture alterations to front, side and rear elevations and alterations to external finish - Approved. This increased the floor area associated with the main dwelling by approximately 48sqm.

6.0 REPRESENTATIONS Copies of representations received can be viewed on the Government's website. This report contains summaries only.

6.1 DOI Highways Services have stated that they find the proposal to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the site access and internal layout is acceptable for the relatively small proposals, providing the building remains ancillary to the existing main dwelling on the site via condition (due to the constrained nature of the access and internal road) - 3 December 2025.

6.2 Marown Parish Commissioners have no objection to the application (23 January 2026).

6.3 The DEFA Ecosystem Policy Team have made the following comments on the application (15 December 2025):

• o They confirm that the Manx Bat Group's preliminary assessment for bats dated June 2025, is all in order and that a suitable level of assessment has been undertaken.
• o They note that the Manx Bat Group found no evidence of bats within the building, but did find 2 active swallow nests, therefore mitigation for bats is not required, but it is required for swallows since access to their nest sites will be permanently blocked by the conversion works.
• o They state that the Proposed Elevations state that 2 nest boxes suitable for swallows are to be erected on the north-east elevation. This would be a suitable location.
• o They refer to comments in the Manx Bat Group's report that ideally the works should commence in summer, to reduce the risk of encountering hibernating bats. However, this would bring the works into conflict with the nesting swallows, and it would be an offence to damage or destroy the swallows and their active, nests, eggs and chicks, or to block entry to their active nests. Though not ideal, they therefore recommend that the swallow access points are blocked in the winter, so that nesting swallows are not present in summer.
• o They request that temporary nesting provision could be made elsewhere for them (e.g. small wooden platforms erected high up within the outbuilding if this has suitable access points for swallows) whilst the conversion works are taking place and before the nest boxes are erected.
• o They note that the proposed elevations also show 2 crevice bat boxes on the southwest elevation. This would be an enhancement measure for bats which they would strongly encourage, though a condition will not be requested for this. Potential conditions
• o Nest boxes suitable for swallows to be erected in the location specified on the Proposed Elevation drawings.
• o No external lighting to be installed unless a sensitive lighting plan, following best practise as detailed in the Bat Conservation Trust and Institute of Lighting Professionals Guidance Note 8/23 on Bats and Artificial Lighting (2023), has been submitted to Planning and approved in writing. Additional Advice
• o Thorough checks for bats should be made prior to any winter blocking works undertaken for the purpose of preventing access for nesting swallows. The applicant should also remain vigilant for the potential for bats throughout works. Should bats be found at any point, works must stop immediately and the Ecosystem Policy Team be contacted on 01624 651577, for advice on how to proceed.

6.4 No comments have been received from neighbouring properties.

- 7.0 ASSESSMENT

7.1 The fundamental issues to consider in the assessment of the current application are:

• 1. The Principle;
• 2. The potential Impact on the surrounding area and countryside;
• 3. Impacts on highway safety;
• 4. Residential amenities for future occupant; and
• 5. Impact on Biodiversity.

7.2 THE PRINCIPLE (HP 11, GP3 & Paragraph 8.10)

• 7.2.1 The starting point in assessing this proposal is the presumption against development in the countryside as set out General Policy 3 and Environment Policy 1. This position is further reinforced by Strategic Policy 2 and Spatial Policy 5 by prioritizing new development in defined

• settlements unless in accordance with GP3. On this basis, General Policy 3 is clear that proposals such as this are generally to be supported as an exception to the principle that there should be no development in the countryside. This is further reinforced by Housing Policy 11 which sets out the criteria for such development to be assessed. In this case and taking the key elements of Housing Policy 11 as the fundamental basis for the assessment, it is considered that the proposal represents an appropriate such exception.
• 7.2.2 In assessing the proposal within the lens of HP 11, eight criteria are assessed and these include matters of redundancy, capability for renovation, architectural/historic/social interest of the affected building, capacity of building to form a satisfactory dwelling, compatibility with adjoining uses, if the building can be connected to existing services, capacity to re-establish original appearance of the building, and the use of materials.
• 7.2.3 With regard to part (a) of Housing policy 11 which borders on redundancy for the original use, information in the structural report highlights the fact that the stables have not been in active agricultural site for some time noted in the absence of evidence of activity within the buildings. Moreover, the site has a larger barn which is most suited to modern farm practices, and which appears to be in active use. It is, therefore, considered that redundancy has been established and the proposal conforms to Housing Policy 11 in this respect.

• 7.2.3 In terms of compliance with part (b) of HP 11, it is considered that a structural report has been provided by the applicant, and this shows that the building could be brought into productive use subject to remedial works to the walls and roofing members. As such, it is concluded that that the existing building is structurally intact and would be structurally suitable for re-use.
• 7.2.4 With regard to compliance with part (c), it is considered that the appearance, age and character have an overall architectural interest to warrant its retention. This is further reinforced by the structural report which details the time of construction of the buildings to be mid to late 1800's. The above are particularly relevant as the traditional Manx stone buildings reflect the character of the Manx countryside and as such would be vital to retain.
• 7.2.5 In terms of compliance with part (d) of Housing policy 11, the buildings are large enough to form a satisfactory dwelling, with a modest, subordinate extension to add the lounge, and this does not affect adversely the character or interest of the building, given its position at the northern elevation of the building which is not prominent, and due to the mature of the site level here which places the extension largely below the surrounding site levels. It is also noted that the changes to fenestrations would be minimal, and the scale of the proposed changes would remain subservient to the host buildings and appropriate when read within the context of its built form, with complimentary finish creating an acceptable contrast on the north elevation, and as such deemed acceptable.

• 7.2.7 Part (e) of HP 11 requires that the residential use of converted rural buildings should not be incompatible with adjoining established uses or, where appropriate, land-use zonings on the area plan. In this case, it is not considered that the conversion of the building would be incompatible with adjoining established use of the farmyard, being positioned close to the residential clusters on site. As well, the proposed residential use would not have adverse impacts upon neighbouring properties in terms of overlooking, loss of light or overbearing impacts given the remote location of the nearest neighbours at Ballacallin Cottage, Foxdale Road which is situated over 380m away. It is also considered that the proposed changes would create an alter adversely the relationship between with the farmhouse on site, given that the upper floor of the barn had previously operated as tourist accommodation.
• 7.2.8 Housing policy 11 also requires that conversions should: (a) where practicable and desirable, re-establish the original appearance of the building; and (b) use the same materials as those in the existing building. In this case, it is considered that the material finish would largely reflect the historic finish of the existing buildings. Whilst it is noted that the introduction of Cedral cladding on the fenestrations of new extension and the new UPVC doors and windows do not reflect any of the traditional finishes the existing buildings, these are not considered to be detrimental, as the scheme would largely utilize the Manx stones which is the dominant building material here, and introduce slates tiles in place of the existing roof tiles, which is more reflective of traditional properties on the Island. As such, the proposal is considered to broadly comply with the relevant elements of Housing Policy 11 in this regard.

• 7.2.9 Finally, Housing Policy 11 requires that converted buildings should be capable of being provided with satisfactory services without unreasonable public expenditure. In this case, the converted buildings are at positions that can easily be provided with these services being situated within close proximity to the built group on site, which already benefits from such services. Therefore, it is considered that the proposal complies with this aspect of Housing Policy 11.
• 7.3 IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING AREA AND LANDSCAPE (EP1, STP4, GP2, & Paragraphs 8.10.1 and 8.10.2)

• 7.3.1 In terms of the potential impact on the surrounding area, it is noted that the development would retain the existing built fabric for these rural buildings, and will ensure the retention of the Islands built heritage, whilst improving the appearance of what is leaning towards dereliction, as leaving the buildings in their current form/state would facilitate their decline, and this complies with Paragraph 8.10 of the Strategic Plan on the Conversion of Rural Buildings to Dwellings and GP2 (c & g).
• 7.3.2 It is also considered that the proposal would be in-keeping with the character of the existing buildings on site, given the retention of the pitch roof design for the converted barns, which is the dominant roof finish on site. As well, the roof finish in slate tiles, and the retention of the Manx stone finish for the buildings will ensure that the development respects the character of the site and area. In addition, the scale and bulk of the new extension, relative to the existing structures would ensure it remains subordinate to the built fabric here.
• 7.3.3 Further to the above, the site sits within a group of buildings within a well-landscaped area where the buildings would not be particularly prominent when viewed from the surrounding highway. Thus, it is considered that the proposed scheme would not increase the impact of the building when viewed within the site context or character of the area. Therefore, the scheme would comply with the requirements of Environment Policy 1, Strategic Policy 4, and General Policy 2 (b, c & f).
• 7.4 RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES FOR FUTURE OCCUPANT (GP 2)

• 7.4.1 In assessing the residential amenity for future occupants, it is considered that the internal accommodation of the proposed dwelling would be suitable for a modern family. It is also considered that the internal accommodation would be of an acceptable size, and all primary rooms would have adequate level of outlook and light. It is also worth noting that due to the property's location, views from the primary windows would be towards the surrounding countryside and existing vegetation.
• 7.4.2 Likewise, the proposal would have an amount of outdoor amenity space appropriate for the scale of the dwelling and the number of bedrooms. There would also be sufficient outdoor play areas, and drying areas for clothing should they be required. As such, it is considered that the amenity space provision in terms of private outdoor space provision would meet the requirements of General Policy 2 (h).

- 7.5 IMPACT ON HIGHWAY SAFETY (GP2)

• 7.5.1 General Policy 2 (h) and (i) requires that there be no unacceptable implications in terms of highway safety resulting from developments. The proposed development will rely on the existing parking spaces available to this part of the site (8 parking spaces), which would exceed the requirements of Transport Policy 7 as stipulated within Appendix 7 of the IOMSP. It is also considered that there would be no changes to the existing access, which could worsen highway safety concerns for future occupant and users of the adjoining highway. Furthermore, DOI Highways have not raised concerns with the application which indicates that there are no significant adverse highway safety impacts.

7.6 IMPACT ON ECOLOGY (EP 4, & GP2)

• 7.6.1 In terms of impacts on ecology or biodiversity within the site, it is also important to establish that if any real harm would result with respect to ecological and environmental concerns, it would involve the potential for impacts on bats and protected birds, resulting from the conversion of the buildings which have habitat potential. However, the application is

supported by supporting ecological information which have been reviewed, commented on, and accepted by the DEFA Ecosystems Team and in this respect, it is felt that the application has satisfied the principles of Environment Policy 4. Conditions would, however, be imposed to ensure that the required mitigation measures are implemented.

• 7.6.2 Given the above, it is considered that the proposals would comply with the requirements of GP2, EP4 and EP5.

7.7 OTHER MATTERS

• 7.7.1 No other concerns have been noted.
• 8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 Overall and on balance, it is considered that the proposal, subject to conditions would comply with General Policy 3, Housing Policy 11, Environment Policy 1 and 2, and Section 8.10 of the Strategic Plan of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016. The application is, therefore, recommended for approval. - 9.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE

9.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).

9.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:

• o applicant (in all cases).
• o a Local Authority; Government Department; Manx Utilities; and Manx National Heritage that submit a relevant objection; and
• o any other person who has made an objection that meets specified criteria.

9.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 9.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):

• o any appellant or potential appellant (which includes the applicant);
• o the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, the Department of Infrastructure, and the local authority for the area;
• o any other person who has submitted written representations (this can include other Government Departments and Local Authorities); and
• o in the case of a petition, a single representative. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.

Decision Made : Permitted Date: 28.01.2026 Determining Officer

Signed : C BALMER Chris Balmer Principal Planner

Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.