Loading document...
Please see supplementary report following Planning Committee meeting 24th April 2008 at end of report.
The application site represents the curtilage of the residential dwelling Elm Bank, Stanley Terrace, Christian Street, Peel. The property is a three storey end terrace building which was formerly used as a residential care home. The property has since been converted back to a single dwelling house
under PA 05/01762/R which was a split decision at appeal where the rear balcony aspect of the proposed development was refused.
The application site is located within an area identified as being Mixed Use by the Peel Local Plan (Planning Circular 6/89). The site is also within the Peel Conservation Area.
Within the adopted Isle of Man Strategic Plan, the following policies are considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application:
"Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
"Within Conservation Areas, the Department will permit only development which would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Area, and will ensure that the special features contributing to the character and quality are protected against inappropriate development."
The following previous planning applications are considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application:
Planning application 05/00676/B sought permission for alterations and the conversion of former nursing home to three apartments. This application was refused on Review 8th September 2005.
Planning application 05/01762/R sought retrospective permission for the alteration of former nursing home to a single dwelling, including balcony to the rear at first floor level. This application was the subject of a split decision with the balcony being refused 9th November 2006. The reason for refusal stated:
"The balconies to the rear would have an unacceptable impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties due to their size and location by virtue of the overlooking of the rear gardens of these properties and the direct overlooking of the upper floor window of the neighbouring property."
The Department of Transport Highways Division does not object this application. Peel Town Commissioners have not commented on this application. The Isle of Man Fire and Rescue Service attaches a note to any subsequent approval. The owner/occupier of the property has expressed an interest in this application. The MHK for the area has asked to be kept informed of the progress of the application.
This application seeks approval for the construction of a metal fire escape to replace the existing balcony (which does not have planning consent) to the rear elevation of the property. The fire escape would serve all three floors of the property being fixed to the western end of the rear elevation which faces south.
The issues to be considered in the assessment of this application are the visual impact of the proposed fire escape, particularly in relation to the Conservation Area setting and the potential for overlooking to adjacent properties.
In terms of visual impact, the fire escape would not represent an enhancement to the Conservation Area, being a somewhat cumbersome structure. However it is considered that as the proposal would be restricted to the rear elevation of the property, which is not readily visible from the street scene, the stair case would not have an unacceptable visual impact so as to justify refusal.
Turning to the issue of overlooking, it is recognised that the nature of use that a large balcony would serve is different to that of a fire escape given the larger area of available floor space provided by the balcony. However despite this difference, there would remain opportunity to stand or sit on the fire escape at varying levels up to second storey height for prolonged periods of time. This, it is considered would lead to an unacceptable level of overlooking of adjacent properties' gardens, namely numbers 33 and 37, to the detriment of residential amenity. This would contravene the requirements of General Policy 2 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan; specifically part (g) which requires new development to protect the amenity of local residents.
Building Control regulations would not require a fire escape for a three storey single dwelling house such as this and as such it is not considered that there is a demonstrated need for the structure to outweigh the associated adverse impacts set out above. Whilst it is accepted that the building previously had a fire escape installed when it was used as a residential care home, it is considered that to reintroduce such a feature would be detrimental to the residential amenity of adjacent neighbours.
It is recommended that the application be refused.
It is considered that the following parties, who submitted comments, accord with the requirements of Planning Circular 1/06 and are therefore, afforded Interested Party Status:
Peel Town Commissioners
The Department of Transport Highways Division
The owners/occupiers of Elm Bank, StanleyTerrace, Christian Street, Peel.
Accordingly the following parties are not granted Interested Party Status:
The Isle of Man Fire and Rescue Service Mr T Crookhall MHK SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT FOLLOWING PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT 24th APRIL 2008
The Planning Committee resolved to approve the application. The Committee were not convinced that the proposed fire escape would result in unacceptable levels of overlooking to adjacent properties so as to warrant refusal of the application. The size of available space that would be provided by the fire escape was not considered to be sufficient to allow persons to sit or stand for prolonged periods of time.
The following conditions should be attached to the approval:
C1. The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
C2. This approval relates to the construction of a fire escape to replace the existing balcony which does not have approval as shown by the plans and information 06, 07 and 08 submitted and date stamped 17th December 2007.
C3. The balcony which has been refused approval shall be removed and all visible signs of the fixings to walls removed and made good within 56 days of the date of this decision becoming final.
Recommended Decision: Refused
Date of Recommendation: 29.02.2008
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal
R 1. The proposed fire escape would result in an unacceptable level of overlooking to neighbouring properties to the detriment of residential amenity, contravening part (g) of General Policy 2contained within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan.
shall be replaced by sash windows in keeping with the windows on the first-floor of the dwelling within 56 days of the date of this decision becoming final.
Decision Made : Approved... Committee Meeting Date : 24/11/2008
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown