{{table:141899}} ### Considerations {{table:141900}} ### Written Representations ### Consultations
Officer's Report
Site
The application site is a two storey dwelling house situated at the St.Judes Cross Road.
Land use zoning / policy
The application site is within an area not zoned for development.
Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982; Planning Circular 1/88 – Houses in the Countryside; Planning Circular 3/91 – Guide to the Design of Residential Development in the Countryside; and Isle of Man Strategic Plan (Modified Draft) 2004; HP12, TP4.
Application No.:
06/01493/B
Applicant:
Mr & Mrs P Watterson
Proposal:
Elevation amendments and erection of a sun lounge on approved dwelling (06/00470B)
Site Address:
East Craige St. Judes Isle Of Man IM7 2EW
Case Officer:
Mr Chris Balmer
Photo Taken:
Site Visit:
12/10/06
Expected Decision Level:
Delegation
Consulttee:
Highways Division
Notes:
Do not oppose
Planning History
06/00470/B - Demolition of existing dwelling and derelict barn and erection of a detached dwelling and double garage with store over - approved
05/02045/B – Demolition of existing dwelling and erection of a replacement dwelling – withdrawn 9/2/06
05/02046/B – Erection of double garage with living accommodation over to replace redundant barn – withdrawn 9/2/06
Proposal
The application proposes elevation amendments and erection of a sun lounge on approved dwelling (06/00470B).
Elevational changes include the installation of two small windows at second floor level within the north and south elevations.
The proposed sunroom would be a single storey extension with a width of 4.5 metres, a length of 5.8 metres and a maximum height of 4.3 metres.
Representations
Andreas Parish Commissioners:- No objection
Highways Division:- Do not oppose
S.P.M.C. & E:- The Society objected to the replacement dwelling (06/470) as being too big to be an acceptable ‘replacement’ and now it is to be made even bigger. If development control of replacements dwellings is to be fair and equitable, then this should be refused as have several others.
We have received no privately written representations objecting to the application.
Assessment / recommendations
The proposal is a modest structure which will have no adverse impact to the detriment of the surrounding area, due to its size, location and due to the southern boundary treatment along the site. The introduction of the windows with the north and south elevations again will not cause adverse impacts to the detriment of residential amenity.
For these reasons the proposals would seem appropriate in this location and therefore my recommendation is for an approval.
I consider that the following meet the criteria of Government Circular 1/06 and should be afforded interested party status:
Highways Division Andreas Parish Commissioners
I consider that the following parties that made representations to the planning application do not meet the criteria of Government Circular 1/06 and should not be afforded interested party status:
Recommendation
Recommended Decision: Permitted
Date of Recommendation: 03.11.2006
Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal
C: Conditions for approval N: Notes attached to conditions R: Reasons for refusal O: Notes attached to refusals
C 1. The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
C 2. This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawings PW-01 REV E and PW-15 REV A all received on 31th August 2006.
I confirm that this decision accords with Government Circular Nos 44/05 (Delegation of Functions to Director of Planning and Building Control) and 47/05 (Delegation of Functions to Senior Planning Officer)
Decision Made: Permitted Date: 7/11/06
Signed: _________________________ M. I. McCauley Director of Planning and Building Control
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
