31 May 2005 · Planning Committee
Telford Cottage, Leodest Road, Andreas, Isle Of Man, IM7 3eg
The proposal involved refurbishing an existing derelict cottage in open countryside, adding significant extensions (increasing footprint by 207% to 135.1 sq m), a detached garage, and extending the curtilage up to 40m into surrounding grazing land.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer determined the existing cottage had lost its lawful residential use through long-term abandonment, as it was unoccupied, in disrepair, obscured by ivy and landscaping, and not maintained, …
Planning Circular 1/88 Residential Housing in the Country
Prohibits reintroduction of residential use to abandoned buildings in countryside and significant curtilage encroachments. Officer applied strictly, finding abandonment evidenced by disrepair, lack of maintenance, and prior refusal; proposal failed as residential reinstatement and curtilage extension harmed rural amenities and openness.
Planning Circular 3/91 'Guide to the Design of Residential Development in the Countryside'
Controls extensions and new structures in countryside to protect character. Extensions and garage deemed disproportionate and prominent, disrupting street scene rhythm and harming visual amenities.
Housing Policy 12
Restricts new housing in countryside, including reuse of abandoned dwellings. Existing cottage lost residential status; refurbishment would detrimentally introduce housing.
Housing Policy 14
Limits curtilage in rural areas to avoid encroachment. Proposed extension up to 40m into grazing land significantly diminished openness.
Housing Policy 15
Requires extensions to respect scale, form, appearance in countryside. 207% footprint increase failed this test, creating incongruous features.
no adverse traffic impacts
no objections
support the restoration of the existing cottage
DOT Highways confirmed no adverse traffic impacts and no objections; Andreas Parish Commissioners had no objections; SPMC&E strongly objected due to the scale of extensions on a rare vernacular Manx cottage.
Key concern: Far too large an element of ‘extension’ to comply with Policy on rare vernacular Manx cottage
SPMC&E
ObjectionIT SHOULD BE REGISTERED because such examples are exceedingly rare and must be important in the history of the development of the MANX COTTAGE.; The Society feels very strongly about this property and will STRONGLY OBJECT to the present proposal.; Far too large an element of ‘extension’ to comply with Policy.
Department of Transport Highways Division
No ObjectionNo adverse traffic impacts.
Andreas Parish Commissioners
No Objectionhave no objections thereto