27 May 2004
3 Ascot Mews, The Paddocks, Ballasalla, Isle Of Man, IM9 2dh
The proposal sought planning permission to park one additional Public Service Vehicle (PSV) taxi at Flat 3, Ascot Mews within The Paddocks complex in Ballasalla, Malew parish. This was linked to Ballacabs Ltd/South Ltd operations, with the applicant clarifying it was for one taxi under existing permissions but seeking …
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
Multiple local residents object strongly to planning application 05/00740/B for 17 apartments on the former squash courts site in Ramsey, citing overdevelopment, inadequate parking, design incompatibility, loss of privacy/light, and breach of building line; IoM Water Authority requests standard water connection condition.
IoM Water Authority
Conditional No ObjectionThe Authority wish to express their interest in the following planning applications and request that a condition of planning be that the applicant must contact the Authority to ensure that a connection is obtained for water supply purposes
Conditions requested: applicant must contact the Authority to ensure that a connection is obtained for water supply purposes, or an amendment to the existing supply under the terms of the Water Supply Byelaws
The 1996 appeal (AP 824, PA 95/0508) concerned a four-storey block of 12 private flats refused for failing to provide 1.5 parking spaces per unit behind the building line, harming the area's character. Appellant argued economic viability and precedents for front parking, but the inspector dismissed it, finding the scheme over-developed and parking visually detrimental despite no highway objections. The 2004 application (03/1979/B) proposed 17 public rental flats to enable Lezayre Estate renewal, supported by DoLGE for housing needs and design echoing Victorian terraces. Objectors and Advisory Council criticised design incompatibility, flat roof, scale, and parking. Inspector acknowledged housing need and residential zoning but found design incongruous, clashing with Victorian architecture and prior approval conditions, recommending refusal. No final decisions stated for either.
Precedent Value
Demonstrates strict enforcement of parking behind building lines in residential areas for visual amenity; approval in principle requires clear site capacity evidence, with design details critical in sensitive Victorian contexts.
