Loading document...
Application No.: 09/00996/GB Applicant: Mr Ollie Byrne Proposal: Erection of a replacement conservatory (in association with 09/00997 CON) Site Address: Dunluce Ballure Road Ramsey Isle Of Man IM8 1NL ### Considerations Case Officer : Mr Chris Balmer Expected Decision Level: Senior Planning Officer ### Written Representations ### Consultations Consultee : Highways Division Notes : Consultee : Clerk To The Commissioners Notes: No objection Consultee : Mr P S Harrison Notes: Comments received
The site represents the residential curtilage of Dunluce, an existing dwelling situated on the eastern side of Ballure Road, to the north of the electric railway crossing and to the immediate south of an existing dwelling, Seafield. Dunluce is a detached property with a roadway which leads from Ballure Road to Ballure Promenade alongside the northern boundary of the site. The property is a handsome building with steeply pitched roof, substantial chimneys, slim vertically proportioned windows with arched heads and corresponding mouldings above and a rather unfortunate lean-to sun room on the south western elevation which has a corrugated sheeted roof, rendered walling with sections of split stone and large, square lights.
The site lies within an area designated on the Ramsey Local Plan of 1999 as Residential. The building is also Registered (RB 215). The site is not within a Conservation Area.
Due to the location of the application site, the zoning and type of development the following Planning Policies are required for consideration:-
"General Policy 2: Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
Policy 32: Extensions or alterations to a Registered Building which would affect detrimentally its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest will not be permitted.
The previous planning applications are considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application:-
Registered Building Consent for the erection of a replacement conservatory (RB no 215 in association with 09/00996GB) - 09/00997/CON - PENDING CONSIDERATION
Registered Building consent for the installation of a satellite dish (In association with 07/00574/GB) Registered Building Nos. 215 - 07/00575/CON - APPROVED
Installation of a satellite dish (In association with 07/00575/CON) - 07/00574/GB - APPROVED Erection of detached garage and creation of vehicular access through widening of existing entrance 98/01334/B - APPROVED
This application seeks approval for Registered Building Consent for the erection of a replacement conservatory (RB no 215 in association with 09/00996GB). The proposal would be a timber framed conservatory with a pitched roof to the southwest elevation.
Ramsey Town Commissioners:-
"No objection"
Department of Transport Drainage Division:
"There must be No discharge of surface water (directly or indirectly) from this proposed development to any foul drainage system(s) so as to comply with the requirements of the Department of Transport Drainage Division and the Sewerage Act 1999."
The Authority has received no privately written representations objecting to the application.
This application is the result of discussion with the owner following the submission and subsequent withdrawal of the previous application which was considered did not respect the character of the Registered Building.
This proposal seeks to replace an existing inappropriate rear extension with a new conservatory which draws heavily on historic photography of the previous, Victorian conservatory and the architectural detailing found in the main house.
These proposals therefore respect the character of the Registered Building and are therefore acceptable.
ASSESSMENT
Any proposal for works to a Registered Building may not adversely affect its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest under the provisions of Environment Policy 32. In this case, the proposal will result in the removal of a part of the building which is modern and unsympathetic and its replacement with a more appropriately styled and proportioned structure. The proposal would enhance the appearance of the existing Registered Building therefore it is considered appropriate.
The proposal would have no adverse impact upon the residential amenities of the neighbouring properties.
RECOMMENDATION
Overall, it is considered the proposed extension would not result in an adverse impact upon the appearance of the property. For these reasons the proposal is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant planning policies as layout within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan and accordingly it is recommended that the application be approved.
The following parties, who submitted comments, accord with the requirements of Planning Circular 1/06 and are therefore, afforded Interested Party Status:
Recommendation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 08.09.2009 Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal
N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal 0 : Notes attached to refusals
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
This approval relates to the erection of a replacement conservatory as proposed in the submitted documents and drawings REF 1, REF 2, REF 3, REF 4, REF 5, REF 6 and REF 7 all received on 9th June 2009.
The external finishes of the extension must match those of the existing building in all respects.
There must be No discharge of surface water (directly or indirectly) from this proposed development to any foul drainage system(s) so as to comply with the requirements of the Department of Transport Drainage Division and the Sewerage Act 1999.
I confirm that this decision accords with Government Circular No 09/09 Delegation of functions, 10/09 Delegation of Functions (Development Procedure), GC No 11/09 (Advertisements) and GC No 12/09 (Registered Buildings) all to the Senior Planning Officer
Decision Made : Permitted Date : Signed :
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown