Loading document...
Application No.: 24/91347/B Applicant: Mr Paul Carey Proposal: Erection of proposed detached Stables Building. Site Address: Ballaslig Ballacorey Road Andreas Isle Of Man IM7 4EL Planning Officer: Russell Williams Expected Decision Level: Planning Committee Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 11.02.2025 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
Reason: The countryside is protected from development and an exception is being made on the basis.
Reason: In view of the location of the site in the open countryside; the Department does not consider the site suitable for anything other than private use.
The proposed development will not give rise to any detrimental impact upon the character or appearance of the landscape virtue of its limited scale, inconspicuous siting and finished appearance. The proposal are therefore considered to be acceptable and comply with General Policy 2 and Environment Policies 1 and 21 of the Strategic Plan.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the following drawings and documents received on 28 November 2024:
It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal: DOI - No objection
_________________________________________________________________ Officer’s Report
1.0 THE SITE - 1.1 The application site is located within the wider holding associated with Ballasleig Croft. The holding is approximately 11 acres which is located on the northern side of the Ballacorey Road (C15) which links the Bride Coast Road (A10) with the Andreas Road (A9). - 1.2 The application site is located to the southwest of the dwellinghouse and is an area of unused and overgrown scrub and existing hardstanding with various items of agricultural/equine paraphernalia stored in the open. - 1.3 To the southern side of the application site is a hedgerow and trees. The site opens onto paddocks to the north and is accessed via an existing track.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL - 2.1 The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a new stable building. - 2.2 The stable is to have a footprint of 11.4m by 3.95m with an overhanging canopy which projects a further 1.35m to the front. - 2.3 The stable is to accommodate two stalls and a central tack room/third stall - all with stable doors to the front (north) and a small window at the rear. - 2.4 The building will be constructed in timber and have a sheeted or shingle roof. Surface water will be channelled to the existing ponds within the site, close to the proposed building.
3.0 PLANNING POLICY - 3.1 The site lies within an area not designated for any particular purpose under the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982. The site is not within a Conservation Area, Area of High Landscape or Coastal Value and Scenic Significance or a Flood Risk Zone.
"Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
3.5 Environment Policy 14: "Development which would result in the permanent loss of important and versatile agricultural land (Classes 1-2) will not be permitted except where there is an overriding need for the development, and land of a lower quality is not available and other policies in this plan are complied with. This policy will be applied to (a) land annotated as Classes 1/2 on the Agricultural Land Use Capability Map; and (b) Class 2 soils falling within areas annotated as Class 2/3 and Class 3/2 on the Agricultural Land Use Capability Map." - 3.6 Environment Policy 19: "Development of equestrian activities and buildings will only be accepted in the countryside where there will be as a result of such development no loss in local amenity, no loss of high quality agricultural land (Classes 1 and 2) and where the local highway network can satisfactorily accommodate any increase in traffic (see Environment Policy 14 for interpretation of Class 1 and 2)." - 3.7 Environment Policy 21: "Buildings for the stabling, shelter or care of horses or other animals will not be permitted in the countryside if they would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the countryside in terms of siting, design, size or finish. Any new buildings must be designed in form and materials to reflect their specific purpose; in particular, cavitywall construction should not be used."
5.0 PLANNING HISTORY - 5.1 No relevant planning history
6.1 The following Statutory Consultees have been consulted and their responses can be summarised as follows: Andreas Commissioners - No comments received.
DOI Highway Services - After reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the existing access is acceptable for the proposals.
6.2 No representations have been received from members of the public.
7.1 The key considerations in the assessment of this planning application are the principle of development and impact on the countryside. - 7.2 The application seeks permission for the construction of a modest stable building on land adjacent to existing paddocks. The site is located in the countryside where General Policy - 3 restricts new development and the proposals are not permitted by GP3. Notwithstanding, Environment Policies 19 and 21 support equestrian development in the countryside subject to meeting various criteria and, therefore, the principle of acceptable subject to compliance with relevant environmental protection policies.
7.3 The stable building is constructed from timber and sheet roofing and is not a more "permanent" construction such as cavity walls and tiled roof. It therefore has less permanence and could be removed with relative ease. This form of construction complies with Environment Policy 21. - 7.4 The site is well screened and occupies an inconspicuous position within the landscape, meaning that the building, with its limited height, will not be readily seen from any publicly
8.1 The proposed development will not give rise to any detrimental impact upon the character or appearance of the landscape virtue of its limited scale, inconspicuous siting and finished appearance. The proposal are therefore considered to be acceptable and comply with General Policy 2 and Environment Policies 1 and 21 of the Strategic Plan. - 9.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
9.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).
9.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:
9.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 9.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
9.5 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make
comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given the Right to Appeal.
I confirm that this decision has been made by the Planning Committee in accordance with the authority afforded to that body by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Committee has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made: Permitted Date: 17.03.2025 Signed : Presenting Officer
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/ customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown