DEC Officer Report

Application No.: 20/00838/MCH Applicant: Onchan District Commissioners Proposal: Minor changes application to PA 20/00434/B involving changes to roof material, roof profile and elevations involving window and door openings alteration Site Address: Groudle Glen Water House And Wheel King Edward Road Onchan Isle Of Man Head of Development Management: Mr S Butler Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 09.09.2020 _________________________________________________________________ Notes for Approval All the applied for changes are hereby approved - - - Amendment to roof material; - - roof profile adjusted; and - - elevations amended - change to window and door openings and to black boarding. ### Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to the following plans/drawings/information: Proposed Elevations Sheets 1 - 3 (Approval 20/00434/B) Proposed Elevation Sheets 1 - 3 (As Amended) Proposed Site Plan Site and Location Plans Application Form Supporting Letter and Copy of original decision notice All date stamped as having been received 05.08.20 _____________________________________________________________________________

Officer’s Report

| | | | | |---|---|---|---| |Basis of Application|Basis of Application|Basis of Application|Basis of Application| |Only one minor changes application may be made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval.|21(1)|20/00434/B – no previous application|Yes| |Must relate to a grant of planning approval in respect of a building|21/2)(a)| |Yes|

|Must specify what minor changes are being sought and why the applicant considers them to be of a minor nature|21(2)(b)|Application form/plans|Yes| |---|---|---|---| |Cannot increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted|21(2)(c)(i)|No change|Yes| |Cannot increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted|21(2)(c)(ii)|No change|Yes| |Cannot alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line|21(2)(c)(iii)|No change|Yes| |Cannot make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted|21(2)(c)(iv)|No change|Yes| |Cannot alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed|21(2)(c)(v)|Conditions relate to species/protection of river so are not impacted on by the changes|Yes| |Cannot be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired|21(2)(d)|Approved 02.07.2020|Yes| | | | | | |Application Content|Application Content|Application Content|Application Content| |Application Form|22(3)(a)| |Yes| |Information in Schedule 1:<br><br>• Site location plan (including flood risk assessment)<br>• The planning approval that is the subject of the application<br>• The changes to that approval which are being applied for<br>• An explanation as to why those changes are being applied for;<br>• (if relevant) the site plan, and the plans, elevations and sections of the proposed buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes.<br>|22(3)(a&c)| |Yes| |Document specified on form but not in Schedule 1|22(3)(b)| |Yes| |Fee|22(3)(4)| |Yes| |Such further info as Department may request prior to determination|22(6)| |N/A| | | | | | |Determination|Determination|Determination|Determination| |Must not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question|23(1)(a)|No change|Yes| |Must not significantly change the nature of the development in question|23(1)(b)|No change|Yes|

| | | | | |---|---|---|---| |Must not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so|23(1)(c)|No concerns – the changes are motivated by a desire to take on board suggestions from the Victorian Society to improve the design, so result in a better development with no new/increased adverse impacts|Yes| |Must not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations)|23(1)(d)|No concerns|Yes| |Must not be more than minor and to be of a magnitude to warrant a new application|23(1)(e)|Amendments are to design details|Yes| |Must not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made.|23(1)(e)|No concerns|Yes| |If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. – is the application considered acceptable?|23(2)|See above|Yes| |Notice of Decision|Notice of Decision|Notice of Decision|Notice of Decision| |Set out whether all, some or no changes are accepted (And which is which)|24(2)(a)|All accepted|All accepted| |For any elements refused, the reasons for that.|24(2)(b)|N/A|N/A|

I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.

Decision Made : Permitted Date: 9/9/20 Determining officer Signed : A MORGAN

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the assessment and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our onlineservices/customers and archive records.