Loading document...
Application No.: 16/00638/B Applicant: Mumba Holdings Proposal: Erection of a boundary fence with associated planting Site Address: Thie Ny Strooan Hillberry Green Douglas Isle of Man IM2 6DE Case Officer : Mr Chris Balmer Photo Taken: 23.06.2016 Site Visit: 23.06.2016 Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation
1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE - 1.1 The application site is the residential curtilage of a detached property known as Thie Ny Strooan, which is located within Hillberry Green, Douglas. The previously existing dwelling to the west of the site has been demolished and a replacement dwelling was recently under construction, although what stage the building works are currently at is unknown. - 1.2 A watercourse runs through the site from north to south. The eastern half of the site rises towards the A18 Mountain Road and has mature tree planting within it. The section of the site closest to Mountain Road is more open but also has tree planting within it, focused mostly around the edges. The boundary with Mountain Road was until recently formed by a Manx sod bank; this has been removed, presumably in anticipation of the grant of planning approval for a previous planning application that was subsequently withdrawn. - 1.3 Behind this boundary line sits a recently completed indoor tennis court. - 1.4 To the southeast of the site is a cluster of three detached dwellings, Gleneagles, Glen Kella and Glen Nook, Mountain Road, Douglas. These properties share an access from the Mountain Road which is situated to the immediate north of Glen Kella and adjoins the southern boundary of the site. A brick wall runs along the boundary. - 1.5 To the north are a number of detached dwellings which form a cul-de-sac development known as The Laurels. These properties are accessed from Mountain Road via Hailwood Avenue. Numbers 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 have boundaries that adjoin or face directly onto the application site.
2.0 PLANNING HISTORY - 2.1 The site has a broad and relevant planning history. Replacement dwellings were approved under successive applications submitted in 2012 (PAs 12/00545/B and 12/001279/B), though it is understood that it is the latter that has been implemented. - 2.2 Also of relevance is the pair of approvals relating to the erection of the tennis court within the site, which was originally approved at appeal under PA 13/00423/B, and latterly approved under delegated authority to PA 14/00154/B; this subsequent application sought approval for an amended design, incorporating the following differences as outlined in the officer report into that latter application:
2.3 Following these two approvals, two applications were submitted but withdrawn before a decision could be issued. PA 15/00688/B sought approval for "Erection of boundary fencing and landscape design", while PA 15/00988/B sought approval for "Erection of a roadside gardeners store with roof top viewing platform, greenhouse and garden shed". In view of the fact that some elements of both applications were potentially unacceptable, and some acceptable, both applications were withdrawn. - 2.4 The last application followed for the re-instatement of boundary bank, erection of gardener's store with viewing platform, erection of garden shed and landscaping - 15/01173/B which was approved.
3.0 THE PROPOSAL - 3.1 Full planning approval is now sought for the erection of a boundary fence with associated planting. The boundary fence would be sited behind the recently approved and completed Manx sod bank which has a roadside height of approximately 0.8 metres. The fence proposed would be a railing fence with a height of 1.8 metres. Set behind the proposed fence it is also proposed to plant a laurel hedgerow.
4.0 PLANNING POLICY - 4.1 In terms of land use designation the application site is part zoned as Low Density Housing in Parkland and part zoned as Predominantly Residential use under the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Douglas Local Plan) Order 1998. The proposed works are located within the part of the application site that is zoned as Predominantly Residential use. - 4.2 In terms of strategic plan policy, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan contains two policies that is considered specifically material to the assessment of this current planning application. General Policy
5.0 REPRESENTATIONS - 5.1 Highway Services of the Department of Infrastructure offered no objection (11.07.2016). - 5.2 Douglas Borough Council offered no objection (08.07.2016).
6.0 ASSESSMENT - 6.1 The key issue is visual amenity of the site in what is a very prominent position. Originally, the boundary was made of a Manx sod bank, very similar in size and positon as the Manx sod bank which was re-constructed recently. Set behind/above the original Manx sod bank was a gorse hedgerow. The remainder of the site was overgrown with a variety of bushes etc. - 6.2 In terms of the works proposed now, it is understood the vertical railing fence is proposed for security reasons and it is believed various positions/designs have been discussed with the applicant, given concerns were raised with the previous application 15/00688/B, which did not include the re-instatement of the sod bank but instead a fence was to front the roadside with a hedgerow behind. Following the Department's concerns with this approach, the application was withdrawn and a subsequent application was submitted which re-instated the sod bank. - 6.3 It is considered the location of the fence behind the existing sod bank would result approximately 1 to 1.2 metre of the railing fence projecting above the sod bank and be visible from the adjacent highway. The inclusion of the laurel hedgerow behind, but close to the railing fence, will potentially result in the growth of the hedgerow growing through the railing fence and perhaps in time the fence will become less apparent from public views. Notwithstanding this, it is considered the position, height and design of the fence is such that it would not become a significant impact upon the visual amenities of the street scene. - 6.4 Visiting the site it appears very clear that additional tree planting is required to ensure the building fits with the street scene as was the original intention and assessment of the Inspector. It is not considered the hedgerow on its own would not achieve what the two permissions (13/00423/B & 14/00154/B) were approved for, as both required tree planting (as shown on approved plans for both buildings) to help reduce the appearance of the building from public views. The applicant is happy for additional semi-mature trees along this roadside boundary. A landscaping condition should be attached to any approval requiring the additional tree planting. This part of Douglas is not characterised by its built development and traditional countryside features would therefore be welcome here. This element of the proposal is therefore considered to be acceptable and fully in accordance with parts (b) and (f) of General Policy 2.
7.0 RECOMMENDATION - 7.1 Subject to the various conditions, it is recommended that the application be approved.
8.0 INTERESTED PERSON STATUS - 8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
With effect from 1 June 2015, the Transfer of Planning & Building Control Functions Order 2015 amends the Town and Country Planning Act 1999 to give effect to the meaning of the word 'Department' to be the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture unless otherwise directed by that Order.
Recommendation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 09.09.2016 Conditions and Notes for Approval: C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No2) Order 2013 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This approval relates to drawings reference numbers X0001 B, P3007 and P0009 all received on 3rd June 2016.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Senior Planning Officer in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.
Decision Made : Permitted Date: 26.09.2016 Determining officer
Signed : S CORLETT Sarah Corlett Senior Planning Officer
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown