Loading document...
Case Officer: Mr S Moore Photo Taken: Site Visit: Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation
1.2 The church is a simple, rendered finish building which lies oriented west to east and set back from the highway by at least 10m. There are two pedestrian accesses into the church grounds, one to the east of the church itself and one to the south. Vehicular access into the site is not available. The church sits within the cemetery.
2.1.1 To hack off the cement render and re-render in a lime render and lime wash to the front and side elevation and to flush point in lime and lime wash the remaining walls.
2.1.2 To introduce a coping to the west gable roof and to add two stone corbels to support this.
2.1.3 Relocate the sundial.
14/00251/CON Registered Building Consent for internal and external alterations (RB No 256 in association with 14/00250/GB), Malew Church, Great Meadow, Castletown - Application Withdrawn
| Application No.: | 14/00524/GB |
| Applicant: | The Vicars And Wardens Of The Parish Of Malew And Santan |
| Proposal: | Internal and external alterations (in association with 14/00526/CON) |
| Site Address: | Malew Church |
| Great Meadow | |
| Castletown | |
| Isle Of Man | |
| IM9 4EB |
14/00250/GB Internal and external alterations (in association with 14/00251/CON), Malew Church, Great Meadow, Castletown - Application Withdrawn
10/00260/CON Registered Building consent for the erection of a detached building to provide an office/staff rest area and lavatory (In association with 10/00259/GB) Registered Building Nos. 256, Malew Church, Great Meadow, Castletown - Application Permitted
10/00259/GB Erection of a detached building to provide an office/staff rest area and lavatory (In association with 10/00260/CON) Registered Building Nos. 256, Malew Church, Great Meadow, Castletown - Application Permitted
"Proposals for development must:
"Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
Environment Policy 32 states:
"Extensions or alterations to a Registered Building which would affect detrimentally its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest will not be permitted."
Environment Policy 34 states:
"In the maintenance, alteration or extensions of pre-1920 buildings, the use of traditional materials will be preferred."
Policy RB/3
General criteria applied in considering registered building applications
The issues that are generally relevant to the consideration of all registered building applications are:-
RB/5: Alterations and Extensions:
"In considering whether to grant planning approval for development which affects a registered building or its setting and in considering whether to grant registered building consent for any works, the Department shall have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses.
Registered Building consent is required for the building's alteration in any way which would affect its special architectural or historic character. There will be a general presumption against alteration or extension of registered buildings, except where a convincing case can be made, against the criteria set out in this section, for such proposals.
Applicants for registered building consent for alteration or extension to a registered building must be able to justify their proposals. They will be required to show why the works which would affect the character of the registered building are desirable or necessary and they should provide full information to enable the Department to assess the likely impact of their proposals on the special architectural or historic interest of the building and on its setting. Where registered buildings are the subject of successive applications for alteration or extension, consideration will also be given to the cumulative affect upon the building's special interest as a result of several minor works which may individually seem of little consequence."
REPRESENTATIONS:
"Architectural Interest and Aesthetic Quality
The pews and panelling are Georgian and they have survived the Victorian period which saw the alteration of many of the old Manx churches. Malew church is said to be "What all the old Manx churches were like before Victorian restoration; outside a white-washed rectangle in fields; inside box-pews and Georgian fittings. North transept 18th century." (Manx Note Book).
The altar window dates from 1860 and it is believed to be the oldest modern stained glass in the Island.
Close Historic Association
The church is the burial place of the famous Manx martyr, Illiam Dhone. He was arrested for treason, shot at Hango Hill in Castletown on January 2nd 1663 and buried in the chancel of Malew church the next day. Some of the plotting of the rebellion is believed to have taken place within the church, with the co-operation of the vicar, Sir Thomas Parr.
There are connections with significant Manx families such as the Goldie-Taubman's of the Nunnery, Douglas (formerly of the Bowling Green, Castletown) who have many memorials within the church. The Moore family of Billown and Great Meadow paid for the construction of the Billown Gallery and they also own a private burial ground within the church grounds.
There is a wooden carving dating from c.1500 which shows the Three Legs of Man and the eagle's claw crest of Lord Monteagle of the Stanley family. The Stanley's became Lord's of Man in 1405 and ruled for 360 years.
Age and Rarity
The oldest part of the church is the nave. The nave is believed to be ancient in its age and it has been suggested that it could be over 1,000 years old, pre-dating the formation of the parishes in the twelfth century and making it possibly the oldest parish church on the Island."
7.1.1 The hacking off of the cement render, understood to have been applied in the 1970s in conjunction with a white cementitious paint and re-rendering in a lime render with associated lime wash to the front and side elevation and to flush point in lime and lime wash the remaining walls is entirely appropriate for a building of this potential age and historic importance. From a building maintenance point of view, this is highly important as cement renders on a 'random rubble' built stone building such as this can be damaging to the interiors as water is held in and has a habit of showing itself in damage to internal finishes. The lime based renders and lime washes will allow the passage of water in a more natural way wetting and drying with the conditions. It is often said that lime based renders allow such a building to 'breathe' which is absolutely correct.
7.1.2 The introduction of a coping to the west gable roof and the addition of two stone corbels to support this are historically appropriate and a response to the overhang introduced with the re-roofing in 1929.
7.1.3 The proposal to relocate the sundial is in response to the fact that it does not function correctly following the 1929 re-roofing which introduced a larger overhang which overshadows the sundial. Re-locating the sun dial further down the wall will result in it receiving sunlight and therefore being able to function correctly.
RECOMMENDATION:
PARTY STATUS:
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No2) Order 2013 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
C 2. The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
| Recommendation | |
| Recommended Decision: | Permitted |
| Date of Recommendation: | 02.07.2014 |
This approval relates to Drawing Number 09-jk-716 100B Existing Elevations, Drawing Number 09-jk-716 101B Elevations & Details, Drawing Number 09-jk-716 103 Location, Drawing Number 09-jk-716 104 Site Plan all date stamped 30th April 2014.
I confirm that this decision accords with the appropriate Government Circular delegating functions to Director of Planning and Building Control /Head of Development Management/ Senior Planning Officer.
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 4/7/14
Signed : _________________________ Chris Balmer Senior Planning Officer
Signed : _________________________ Michael Gallagher Director of Planning and Building Control
Signed : _________________________ Jennifer Chance Head of Development Management
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown