Loading document...
Application No.: 20/00249/B Applicant: Mr John Kinvig Proposal: Erection of a single storey extension to rear of dwelling Site Address: 8 Woodbourne Villas Alexander Drive Douglas Isle Of Man IM2 3QG Planning Officer: Mr Peiran Shen Photo Taken: 26.03.2020 Site Visit: 26.03.2020 Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 06.05.2020 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. This application is considered to comply with General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan and the Residential Design Guidance.
This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawing no 1867-01, 1867-02 datestamped as having been received on 2nd March 2020. _______________________________________________________________ Interested Person Status – Additional Persons None _____________________________________________________________________________
1.0 THE SITE - 1.1 The application site is the residential curtilage of 8 Woodbourne Villas, 38 Alexander Drive, Douglas, a two-storey terraced house located on the north of the end of Alexander Drive. The house has an existing single-storey extension to the east of the rear elevation.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL - 2.1 The proposed work is the erection of a single-storey extension on the rear elevation to the north of the property. - 2.2 The proposed extension is going to have the following features:
2.3 The proposed work also involve the following:
3.0 PLANNING HISTORY - 3.1 The existing extension was approved under PA 19/00708/B.
4.0 PLANNING POLICY - 4.1 In terms of local policy, the site lies within an area designated as Predominantly Residential Use in the Douglas Local Plan 1998. The site is within the Selborne Drive Conservation Area. - 4.2 In terms of strategic plan policy, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 contains the following policies that are considered materially relevant to the assessment of this current planning application: - 4.3 General Policy 2: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
4.4 Whilst the site is located within a CA, it is helpful to be aware of the policies which generally apply outwith such areas: "8.12.1 Extensions to Dwellings in built-up areas or sites designated for residential use: As a general policy, in built-up areas not controlled by Conservation Area or Registered Building policies, there will be a general presumption in favour of extensions to an existing property where such extensions would not have an adverse impact on either adjacent property or the surrounding area in general."
4.5 Residential Design Guidance (July 2019) provides advice on the design of new houses and extensions to an existing property as well as how to assess the impact of such development on the living conditions of those in adjacent residential property. - 4.6 RDG 4.2 Single Storey Rear Extension sets out some key considerations. These include the impact on the amenities of those in neighbouring properties such as loss of light and/or overbearing. These impacts can be regulated by designing with the right depth (projection) and location. The section also specifically mentioned that terraced/semi-detached dwellings have the potential for the greatest concern due to the potential of "tunnel effect". - 4.7 RDG 5 sets out key considerations regarding architectural details. These include window details and external finishing. The general idea is that the extension should have a similar style with the main dwelling for a coherent appearance unless the clash between modern and traditional design can be handled with elegance. - 4.8 RDG 7 sets out key considerations regarding the impact on neighbouring properties. These include the potential loss of light/overshadowing, overbearing impact upon outlook and overlooking resulting in a loss of privacy.
5.0 REPRESENTATION - 5.1 Douglas Borough Council has no objection on this application (18/03/2020). - 5.2 DoI Highway Services do not oppose this application (19/03/2020).
6.0 ASSESSMENT - 6.1 The main concerns for this application are its impact on the character and landscape of the Conservation Area and its impact on the amenities of the neighbours. - 6.2 The extension is at the rear of the property, there are no public vantage points that have a clear view of the extension. The extension is designed in a similar style as the main dwelling. It should not stand out around the neighbours. Therefore, there is no adverse impact on the character or landscape of the Conservation Area. - 6.3 The adjacent neighbour has an existing extension of similar size right next to the proposed extension. There is a set of windows facing the site on their extension and the proposed extension would not cover these windows as the flat roof is just below the window edge. Therefore, there is no concern over loss of light or overshadowing.
7.0 CONCLUSION - 7.1 The proposal is considered to comply with General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan and Residential Design Guidance Section 4, 5 and 7. Therefore, it is recommended for approval.
8.0 IINTEREST PERSON STATUS - 8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
8.2 The decision-maker must determine:
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.
Decision Made : Permitted Date: 11.05.2020 Determining officer
Signed : S CORLETT Sarah Corlett Principal Planner
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown